Animal Testing...= a big fat no for me. I mean, if it were in a humane way (Like, let's use this shampoo on an animal's FUR, then, no wait, 'cause if it got sick...no) I mean, there are people I'm sure that are out there, waiting to either: a-die or b-be tested upon for money. Pay them enough and I'm sure they'd do it...

No experience? Jockey, it's an animal, you can "communicate" or something, plus if you fall off, at least you don't die... oh wait, you said I'd have to be in the top half? Derby, if you die, it's fast and quick...

The image of whatever you put isn't showing up.

I used to be really against animal testing because I thought it was horrible for the animals, but now I just think, "You know, there are so many people who would be willing to test products like that for money, and if what they're making is so bad that it's giving animals cancer and shit, shouldn't they know not to put poisonous/harmful things in their products, anyway? And hey, if nobody wants to do testing on themselves for money, there are a whole bunch of worthless people in our jails that would be wonderful test subjects."

Kentucky Derby.

It was showing up as an 'x' before(Damn you Internet Explorer), but that is a great picture. I almost wish his head was falling more to a side, though.

*My thoughts to animal testing are that it can be cruel, and I wish they could find an alternative source; also, certain animals are different from human beings, so it can be rather pointless. I'd have to do the Kentucky Derby...I've always wanted to ride a horse.

I'm against animal testing in all forms... I've seen too many pictures of make-up test bunnies to be okay with that.

As for the would you rather, I would rather race the indy 500. One big crash as long as I can avoid it could put me in the top half of the field. Plus there are way more cars in the indy 500 than horses in the Kentucky Derby, I like my odds, and not having to depend on the horse to get me there.